Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, in view of the interim moratorium under Section 96 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 and the pending interim applications before the DRT, the Bank could be restrained from issuing the sale certificate and the DRT directed to decide the applications on a fixed date.
Analysis: The proceeding concerned steps taken under the SARFAESI framework after the asserted commencement of an interim moratorium. The secured asset had already been taken in possession and auctioned, but the purchaser had not yet been issued a sale certificate. The Bank, on instructions, stated that it would not issue the sale certificate until the interim applications pending before the DRT were heard and disposed of. Both sides also consented to cooperate and avoid adjournments so that the applications could be decided on the next listed date. In these circumstances, the Court directed the DRT to hear and dispose of the interim applications on the specified date and recorded that the Bank's statement would continue to operate pending that decision.
Conclusion: The Court granted interim protective directions, restrained issuance of the sale certificate until the DRT decided the pending interim applications, and disposed of the writ petition.