Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the demand raised for the period beyond the normal limitation period was sustainable and whether the penalty imposed could survive.
Analysis: The demand arose from imports of optical fibre cables for a period covered by a show-cause notice issued after the relevant clearances. The classification issue was not pressed for decision in this appeal, and the dispute was confined to limitation. In view of the earlier Larger Bench reference on the same classification controversy and the Tribunal's consistent approach in similar matters, invocation of the extended period was held to be unwarranted. The demand was therefore confined to the normal period of limitation, and the penalty linked to the extended demand could not be sustained.
Conclusion: The extended period of limitation was disallowed, the demand was restricted to the normal period, and the penalty under Section 114A was set aside, in favour of the assessee.