TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether payments made to non-resident software suppliers for purchase of software were liable to disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for alleged non-deduction of tax at source under section 195 of the Income-tax Act, 1961; (ii) Whether employees' contribution to provident fund paid before the due date for filing the return was disallowable; (iii) Whether overdue receivables from associated enterprises constituted an international transaction liable to transfer pricing adjustment and, if so, the appropriate rate for benchmarking interest.
Issue (i): Whether payments made to non-resident software suppliers for purchase of software were liable to disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for alleged non-deduction of tax at source under section 195 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The payment for software purchase was examined in the light of the settled position that consideration paid by Indian end-users or distributors to non-resident computer software suppliers for resale or use of software under licence arrangements is not royalty. On that basis, the payment was treated as outside the scope of royalty under section 9(1)(vi) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and no income was held taxable in India on that count.
Conclusion: The disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) was not sustainable and the addition was directed to be deleted in favour of the assessee.
Issue (ii): Whether employees' contribution to provident fund paid before the due date for filing the return was disallowable.
Analysis: The contribution was found to have been paid on or before the due date prescribed for filing the return under section 139(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The issue was treated as governed by the settled principle that timely payment within the return-filing due date protects the deduction from disallowance.
Conclusion: The disallowance of employees' contribution to provident fund was deleted in favour of the assessee.
Issue (iii): Whether overdue receivables from associated enterprises constituted an international transaction liable to transfer pricing adjustment and, if so, the appropriate rate for benchmarking interest.
Analysis: Overdue receivables beyond the credit period were treated as a separate international transaction within the meaning of section 92B of the Income-tax Act, 1961. For benchmarking the notional interest, the appropriate yardstick was held to be LIBOR with an appropriate spread, and LIBOR plus 200 basis points was adopted as the proper rate for the adjustment.
Conclusion: The transfer pricing adjustment on overdue receivables was upheld, but the interest was to be benchmarked using LIBOR plus 200 basis points.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded on the software royalty disallowance and provident fund issue, while the transfer pricing adjustment on overdue receivables was sustained with modification to the benchmarking rate.
Ratio Decidendi: Consideration paid for purchase or use of computer software by Indian end-users to non-resident suppliers is not royalty, employees' contribution to provident fund paid before the return-filing due date is allowable, and delayed receivables from associated enterprises beyond the credit period can constitute an international transaction requiring benchmarking on an arm's length basis.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
