Investment banking fees rendered outside India held not taxable as fees for technical services under treaty and domestic law.

Commission and fees received for investment banking, underwriting and related services rendered outside India were treated as not taxable in India as fees for technical services. The Tribunal applied section 9(1)(vii) and the India-UK treaty test, noting that the same issue had already been decided in the assessee's favour for earlier years and that no contrary factual or legal distinction was shown for the year under appeal. On that settled basis and the rule of consistency, the receipts were held to fall outside the technical services charge and the addition was deleted.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether commission or fees received by the assessee from Indian companies outside India for investment banking, underwriting and related services was taxable in India as fees for technical services.

Analysis: The dispute turned on whether the receipts fell within section 9(1)(vii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal noted that the identical issue had already been decided in the assessee's own case for earlier years, and that the receipts were for services rendered outside India in connection with ADRs/GDRs and investment banking transactions. It further followed the settled view that such receipts did not constitute fees for technical services under the India-UK treaty, and that the technical services test was not satisfied on the facts. Applying the earlier binding view and the rule of consistency, no contrary factual or legal distinction was shown for the year under appeal.

Conclusion: The receipts were not taxable in India as fees for technical services, and the addition was rightly deleted.

Final Conclusion: The Revenue's challenge failed, and the assessee's treaty-based non-taxability of the impugned commission and fees was upheld.

Ratio Decidendi: Commission or fees for investment banking and related services rendered outside India are not taxable as fees for technical services in India where, on the settled treaty position and consistent prior rulings in the assessee's own case, the payment does not satisfy the applicable treaty test.

---