Carry forward of agricultural loss under amalgamation was barred against rubber income's State-tax component under Kerala tax law.

Carry forward of unabsorbed agricultural loss from an amalgamated plantation company was not available for set-off against the agricultural income component of rubber-manufacturing income under Rule 7A. The text explains that such income is first computed under the Central income-tax framework and then split between agricultural and non-agricultural components, but carry forward and set-off of agricultural loss is controlled by Section 12 of the Kerala Agricultural Income Tax Act, 1991. That provision allows set-off only against the same assessee's income and only within eight years. Because the loss belonged to the amalgamated company, the claim was time-barred, and Section 72A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 did not extend to the State-law agricultural income component.

---

---

Issues: Whether carried forward unabsorbed loss of an amalgamated plantation company could be set off against the agricultural income component of rubber-manufacturing income under Rule 7A of the Income-tax Rules, 1962, in the assessment of the amalgamating company under the Kerala Agricultural Income Tax Act, 1991.

Analysis: Income from manufacture of rubber under Rule 7A is first computed as business income under the Central income-tax framework and thereafter bifurcated, with 65% allocated to agricultural income tax and the balance 35% to central income-tax assessment. The carry forward and set-off of agricultural loss, however, is governed by Section 12 of the Kerala Agricultural Income Tax Act, 1991, which permits set-off only against the income of the same assessee and for a maximum period of eight years. The claimed loss belonged to the amalgamated company, the claim was beyond the statutory time limit, and the scheme of amalgamation did not create any entitlement to carry forward such loss into the hands of the amalgamating company. Section 72A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 did not assist because the setting off of agricultural loss against the State tax component remained within the exclusive domain of the Agricultural Income Tax assessment.

Conclusion: The claim for set-off was not allowable and was rightly rejected under Section 12 of the Kerala Agricultural Income Tax Act, 1991.

---