Just a moment...
We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
- Overview Summary
- Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
- Relevant Case Laws
- Tariff / Classification / HSN
- Expert views from TaxTMI
- Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a claim arising after the liquidation commencement date, based on a later arbitral award, could be admitted in liquidation proceedings and whether the liquidator was justified in rejecting a claim filed after the last date prescribed in the public announcement.
Analysis: The statutory scheme under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 and the IBBI (Liquidation Process) Regulations, 2016 requires claims to be submitted and proved with reference to the liquidation commencement date. Regulation 12(2)(a) calls upon stakeholders to submit claims as on that date, Regulation 16(1) requires submission on or before the last date mentioned in the public announcement, and Regulation 16(2) requires proof of debt or dues as on the liquidation commencement date. Regulation 28, dealing with debt payable at a future time, was treated as the only limited exception, and it did not support admission of a claim that itself arose only after liquidation commencement. The later arbitral award did not alter the position because the claim had not existed on the liquidation commencement date.
Conclusion: The liquidator correctly rejected the claim, and the challenge to that rejection failed.
Ratio Decidendi: When the liquidation regulations fix the liquidation commencement date as the cut-off for filing and proving claims, no claim arising thereafter can be entertained in liquidation except within the limited framework expressly provided by the regulations.