Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the addition of Rs. 8,00,000 as unexplained investment under section 69, based only on an Excel sheet entry of Rs. 8,000 multiplied by 100 without supporting material, was sustainable.
Analysis: The addition rested on a solitary Excel-sheet entry found in the search of a third party, and the figure written therein was only Rs. 8,000. No independent document, corroborative evidence, or material from the assessee was brought on record to justify treating that figure as Rs. 8,00,000. The conclusion reached by the lower authorities was therefore founded only on presumption and suspicion, not on concrete evidence linking the assessee to the alleged cash payment.
Conclusion: The addition was not sustainable and was deleted. The issue was decided in favour of the assessee.