Jurisdiction transfer and incriminating material rules invalidated reassessment and section 153A additions in search proceedings.

After a valid transfer of jurisdiction under section 127(2), the earlier Assessing Officer lacked authority to issue a section 148 notice or obtain sanction, so the reassessment was void ab initio. In section 153A proceedings for completed and unabated years, additions for long-term capital gains, cash loans and notional interest required incriminating material found in the assessee's own search. Material from other searches, third-party statements and estimated inferences, without corroborative evidence in the assessee's premises, was insufficient. A retracted section 132(4) statement, standing alone, could not sustain the additions, so the disputed additions were deleted.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the notice issued under section 148 and the consequential reassessment were valid after transfer of jurisdiction under section 127(2); (ii) Whether additions made under section 153A for long-term capital gains, cash loans and notional interest could survive in the absence of incriminating material found during the search.

Issue (i): Whether the notice issued under section 148 and the consequential reassessment were valid after transfer of jurisdiction under section 127(2).

Analysis: The assessment jurisdiction had already been transferred to the Central Circle by a valid order under section 127(2). Once the transfer took effect, the erstwhile Assessing Officer ceased to have authority to initiate reassessment or to obtain sanction for that purpose. The Explanation to section 127 extended the transfer to all proceedings commenced after the transfer date, and a notice issued thereafter by the earlier officer was therefore without jurisdiction.

Conclusion: The notice under section 148 was void ab initio and the reassessment founded on it could not stand.

Issue (ii): Whether additions made under section 153A for long-term capital gains, cash loans and notional interest could survive in the absence of incriminating material found during the search.

Analysis: For the completed and unabated assessment years, additions under section 153A had to rest on incriminating material unearthed in the assessee's own search. The additions were founded on information gathered from other searches, third-party statements and estimated inferences, while no incriminating document or corroborative evidence was found in the assessee's premises. A statement under section 132(4), especially when retracted and unsupported by independent evidence, could not by itself justify the additions. The material relied upon did not satisfy the statutory requirement for disturbing completed assessments.

Conclusion: The additions for long-term capital gains, cash loans and notional interest were unsustainable and were deleted.

Final Conclusion: The jurisdictional defect vitiated the reassessment for AY 2011-12, and the remaining additions for the other years also failed for want of incriminating material, resulting in deletion of the entire disputed additions.

Ratio Decidendi: After a valid transfer under section 127, the earlier Assessing Officer loses authority to initiate reassessment or grant sanction, and in section 153A proceedings for unabated years, additions can be made only on the basis of incriminating material found in the assessee's search, not on uncorroborated statements or third-party material.

---