Just a moment...
We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
- Overview Summary
- Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
- Relevant Case Laws
- Tariff / Classification / HSN
- Expert views from TaxTMI
- Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment order and consequential notices were liable to be set aside for failure to grant the assessee an opportunity of personal hearing under the faceless assessment procedure.
Analysis: Section 144B(7)(vii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 permits the assessee to request a personal hearing when a variation is proposed in the draft assessment order. The corresponding framework under Section 144B requires consideration of that request, and the absence of any prescribed mode in the show-cause notice could not justify denial of the opportunity. In the facts of the case, the request for hearing was made but was not entertained, which amounted to a breach of the statutory safeguard and the principles of natural justice.
Conclusion: The assessment order, demand notice, and penalty notice were set aside and the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication after granting a video-conference hearing to the petitioner.