Penny stock share gains treated as bogus accommodation entries where genuineness was not proved

Penny stock share transactions claimed as short-term capital gains were rejected as bogus where surrounding circumstances showed an accommodation-entry pattern and the assessee failed to prove genuineness. Applying the jurisdictional High Court's settled view, the Tribunal treated the transactions as lacking credible explanation and upheld their assessment as unexplained income, including additions characterised as unexplained cash credit and unexplained expenditure. The assessee's explanation was not accepted, and the appellate challenge to the assessment additions failed.

---

---

Issues: Whether the additions made on account of share transactions in a penny stock scrip, treated as unexplained cash credit and unexplained expenditure, were justified.

Analysis: The assessee claimed short-term capital gains from purchase and sale of shares, but the transactions were examined against the backdrop of survey findings and the settled view that such penny stock dealings may be used for accommodation entries and artificial capital gains. The Tribunal followed the jurisdictional High Court's view that transactions of this nature, when carried out through a common modus operandi and lacking credible explanation, can rightly be treated as bogus. On that basis, the explanation offered by the assessee was not accepted and the additions were sustained.

Conclusion: The additions under the Income-tax Act, 1961 were upheld and the appeal failed.

Final Conclusion: The assessee's challenge to the assessment additions was rejected and the appellate relief was denied.

Ratio Decidendi: Share transactions in a penny stock scrip may be disregarded and taxed as unexplained income where the surrounding circumstances show a bogus accommodation-entry device and the assessee fails to establish genuineness.

---