Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was sustainable where the assessee, following the mercantile system of accounting, had accounted only the duty drawback actually received and the balance was treated as not received during the year.
Analysis: The addition arose from a difference between the duty drawback credited in the accounts and the amount reflected in Form 26AS. The assessee had disclosed the relevant particulars and had accounted the receipt on the basis followed in its books. On these facts, the non-received portion of the duty drawback did not establish concealment of income or furnishing of inaccurate particulars. Since the penalty provision requires a clear finding of concealment or inaccurate particulars, the mere disallowance or addition on this issue did not justify penalty.
Conclusion: Penalty under section 271(1)(c) was not leviable and was directed to be deleted.