Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the voluntary retirement compensation received on closure of the HMT Tractor Division was exempt under section 10(10B) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The compensation was paid under a Government-approved scheme linked to closure of the Tractor Division and budgetary support for clearing employee dues, with employees not opting for the scheme liable to retrenchment. The Tribunal followed its earlier coordinate bench decisions on identical facts and the reasoning adopted in the Madras High Court decision treating such receipts as compensation on closure and not as ordinary voluntary retirement consideration. The scheme's object was rehabilitation of employees on closure of the undertaking, bringing the receipt within the scope of section 10(10B).
Conclusion: The receipt was held exempt under section 10(10B), and the assessee was entitled to full relief on the amount received.