Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether deduction under section 80P of the Income-tax Act, 1961 could be denied through an intimation under section 143(1) solely because the return was filed beyond the due date under section 139(1).
Analysis: The return was admittedly filed belatedly, but the adjustment made under section 143(1) was held unsustainable because the then applicable provision did not provide for disallowance of deduction under section 80P merely on account of late filing. The reasoning turned on the limited scope of prima facie adjustments under section 143(1), which did not include the impugned denial for the assessment year in question. The decision also followed the view that deduction claims of this nature could not be rejected by way of a mechanical adjustment in the absence of a specific enabling provision applicable for that year.
Conclusion: The denial of deduction under section 80P through section 143(1) for delayed filing was not sustainable, and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.