Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether ad interim relief in the form of stay of recovery of tax/demand should be granted to the petitioner subject to deposit of a specified amount.
Analysis: The petition challenges a notification relied upon in the impugned order and notes that the same notification has been struck down by another High Court with a petition pending before the Supreme Court where no stay has been granted. The tax demand originally in the range of Rs. 24 Crores was reduced after rectification to approximately Rs. 21 Crores. The petitioner sought interim protection anticipating uncertainty about the appellate authority striking down the notification. In the circumstances, conditional interim relief by way of stay of recovery was considered appropriate, calibrated to the quantum ordinarily required for pursuing an appeal (10 percent of the present demand) and made subject to a time-bound deposit to balance equities and protect revenue interests.
Conclusion: Ad interim relief granted in favour of the petitioner subject to deposit of Rs. 2.10 Crores within six weeks, failing which the ad interim relief shall stand vacated.