Reassessment validity: reopening under section 148/147 unsupported and additions under section 69C/115BBE held invalid.

Reopening of assessment under section 148/147 was invalidated for lack of concrete material establishing the requisite reasons to believe; the reassessment record contained unsupported assertions, withheld source information, and no evidence of manipulation or conspiracy, so additions under section 69C read with section 115BBE rested on conjecture and were set aside, resulting in the reassessment and consequential additions being struck down in favour of the assessee.

---

---

Issues: Whether the reassessment proceedings initiated by issuing notice under section 148 read with section 147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and consequential additions under section 69C read with section 115BBE are valid, or whether the reopening and additions are without jurisdiction and based on conjecture.

Analysis: The factual matrix shows purchase and sale of shares through a broker resulting in declared short term capital gain already offered to tax. The notice under section 148A(b) alleged fictitious LTCG/STCL but the reassessment record lacks tangible evidence of manipulation, illegitimate gain, or participation in any larger conspiracy. The Assessing Officer relied on information purportedly received but denied the assessee access to that information and made inconsistent factual assertions (including incorrect non-filer status and unsupported figures). The Assessing Officer and the Commissioner (Appeals) did not demonstrate any concrete materials establishing the necessary reasons to believe for reopening; the additions were made on assumptions, conjectures and surmise without probing or rectifying evident errors in the reopening material.

Conclusion: The reassessment notice issued under section 148 and consequential proceedings and additions under section 69C read with section 115BBE are invalid; the reopening and additions are set aside and the appeal is allowed in favour of the assessee.

---