Protective addition under Section 68 rejected where beneficiaries already held liable, preventing double taxation and deleting the addition.

Whether a protective addition under the Income-tax Act can be sustained where substantive additions from the same transactions have been completed against ultimate beneficiaries: the tribunal applied the principle that unexplained cash credits are taxable unless the assessee meets the statutory burden but held that confirming a protective Section 68 addition against a conduit assessee would produce double taxation when beneficiaries have already been assessed; only commission income attributable to the conduit was appropriate, and the protective addition was deleted with the revenue appeal dismissed.

---

---

Issues: Whether a protective addition under Section 68 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 can be sustained in the hands of an assessee (conduit/company providing accommodation entries) where the substantive addition arising from the same transaction has already been completed in the hands of the ultimate beneficiaries.

Analysis: The facts involve large bank credits alleged to be accommodation entries introduced through the assessee company and protective addition made by the Assessing Officer under Section 68 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The relevant legal framework includes the principle that unexplained cash credits may be treated as income under Section 68 unless the assessee discharges the statutory burden, and the exercise of making a protective addition where substantive assessment proceedings may be pending or completed against other parties. The impugned order of the appellate authority found that the assessee acted as a conduit and that commission income (if any) was the only proper addition in the assessee's hands; substantive additions arising from the same arrangement had already been completed in the hands of the beneficiaries. The Tribunal followed a directly on-point earlier decision of the Tribunal in related proceedings and applied that precedent to hold that confirming a protective addition in the assessee's hands would amount to double taxation where substantive assessment has been finalized against the beneficiaries.

Conclusion: Protective addition under Section 68 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 cannot be sustained in the assessee's hands where the substantive addition arising from the same transaction has already been completed in the hands of the beneficiaries; appeal of the Revenue is dismissed and the protective addition is deleted in favour of the assessee.

---