Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) erred in deciding the appeal without giving the assessee a proper and reasonable opportunity of being heard, and whether the CIT(A)'s order should be set aside and the matters remitted for fresh decision after affording opportunity of hearing.
Analysis: The Tribunal examined the record of proceedings before the CIT(A) and found that the CIT(A) proceeded to decide the controversy in the absence of the assessee/its authorised representative and without providing a proper and reasonable opportunity of being heard. The Tribunal noted the legal principle that a party must be afforded an opportunity of hearing before adverse findings are recorded and relied on precedent establishing that absence of such opportunity vitiates the order. In view of this defect the Tribunal did not decide the substantive merits itself but considered it appropriate in the interests of justice to set aside the CIT(A)'s findings and remit the issues for fresh consideration by the CIT(A) after giving the assessee a proper hearing.
Conclusion: The CIT(A)'s order is set aside on the ground of failure to provide a proper and reasonable opportunity of hearing; the matters are remitted to the file of the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication on merits after affording opportunity of hearing to the assessee. The appeal is allowed for statistical purposes.