Just a moment...
We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
- Overview Summary
- Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
- Relevant Case Laws
- Tariff / Classification / HSN
- Expert views from TaxTMI
- Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether additions made by the Assessing Officer based on projected revenues and projections filed with bank can be sustained where the assessee has recognised revenue under Percentage Completion Method in accordance with Accounting Standard-7 and actual revenue and costs are available.
Analysis: The appeals concern identical factual and legal questions for AY 2015-16 and AY 2016-17 arising from a search and seizure. The assessee, a partnership engaged in real estate development, recognised revenue under the percentage completion method in line with Accounting Standard-7. The Assessing Officer computed profits using projected revenue figures submitted to a bank rather than the actual revenues and costs furnished in audited books and used for filing returns. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) directed that computation of profits should be on the basis of actual revenue recognised and actual cost incurred; the Tribunal notes the Assessing Officer also recorded that the assessee recognised profits according to AS-7 and that reliance on projections when actuals are available is unwarranted.
Conclusion: The addition based on projected figures is not sustainable and the deletion of the additions by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) is upheld; outcome is in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an assessee recognises revenue under Accounting Standard-7 and audited actual revenue and costs are available, assessment additions based on projected revenues filed with third parties cannot be sustained over the actuals.