Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the addition of Rs.121.48 crores made by the Assessing Officer and confirmed by the Commissioner (Appeals) in respect of amounts written off in the assessee's books as due from its subsidiary Airline Allied Services Ltd. could be sustained as not being bad debts / not being wholly and exclusively for the assessee's business for A.Y. 2009-10.
Analysis: The Tribunal examined the nature of the transactions between the assessee and its subsidiary, noting that the amounts related to reimbursable costs and expenditures incurred by the subsidiary and that similar transactions occurred in the previous year. The assessee's audit committee recommended and the board approved the write-off on 24/11/2007, and the amounts were written off in the assessee's books. The Assessing Officer and the Commissioner (Appeals) did not produce evidence to controvert the factual record showing the write-off or to demonstrate that the debts were not recoverable. The Tribunal relied on settled legal principles that a debt written off in the assessee's books as irrecoverable need not be independently proved as bad debt by further evidence, and that additions cannot be made on the basis of mere surmise and conjecture.
Conclusion: The addition of Rs.121.48 crores is deleted and the ground of appeal is allowed in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where amounts are written off in the assessee's books as irrecoverable and the record shows the write-off with no evidence to the contrary, the tax authorities cannot sustain additions on mere surmise; such book write-offs suffice for allowing bad debt deduction under the Income-tax law.