Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the gains arising from sale of shares of Grasim Industries and Gujarat Ambuja Cement were assessable as business income or as long-term capital gains; (ii) Whether the addition of Rs. 16,56,000 on account of alleged profit from sale of shares of Reliance Petro Chemicals Ltd. was sustainable.
Issue (i): Whether the gains arising from sale of shares of Grasim Industries and Gujarat Ambuja Cement were assessable as business income or as long-term capital gains
Analysis: The shares were supported by contract notes and purchase-sale details, and the assessee had treated the holdings as investments. The cited CBDT circular recognizes that listed shares held as investments and transferred after the prescribed holding period should ordinarily be accepted as capital assets for the purpose of taxation of surplus, while the nature of the holding remains fact-specific. The record also showed that the balance holdings in the same scrips were accepted as capital assets in later years.
Conclusion: The gains were held to be long-term capital gains and not business income, in favour of the assessee.
Issue (ii): Whether the addition of Rs. 16,56,000 on account of alleged profit from sale of shares of Reliance Petro Chemicals Ltd. was sustainable
Analysis: The material showed that the relevant capital gains from the Reliance Petro Chemicals Ltd. share transactions had already been offered and taxed in the earlier assessment year, and the same profit could not be taxed again in the year under appeal. On the facts, no separate taxable gain survived for the year in question.
Conclusion: The addition was deleted, in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded on the surviving grounds, with the impugned additions being set aside and the disputed share-sale gains accepted in the manner claimed by the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Surplus from sale of listed shares is to be assessed according to the assessee's investment or trading treatment on the facts, and the same income cannot be taxed twice in different assessment years.