Just a moment...
We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
- Overview Summary
- Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
- Relevant Case Laws
- Tariff / Classification / HSN
- Expert views from TaxTMI
- Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Section 14A disallowance under Rule 8D not applicable where no exempt income arose; deletion confirmed on appeal.</h1> The central issue was whether a disallowance under Section 14A, computed by the AO under Rule 8D, was sustainable where the assessee held investments but ... Disallowance u/s 14A r/w Rule 8D - No exempt income in the relevant period - application of Rule 8D(2)(iii) - HELD THAT: - As undisputed fact that during the impugned assessment year, the assessee has not received any exempt income from the aforesaid investment. It is no more res integra that where no exempt income is received or receivable during the relevant period no disallowance u/s. 14A of the Act is warranted. CIT(A) has granted relief to the assessee following the decision rendered in the case of Cheminvest Ltd. [2015 (9) TMI 238 - DELHI HIGH COURT] - We find no infirmity in the impugned order on this issue; hence, the same is upheld. [Paras 4] Final Conclusion: Revenue's appeal is dismissed - disallowance under section 14A read with Rule 8D was correctly deleted for Assessment Year 2018-19 because no exempt income was received in that year. Issues: Whether the deletion of disallowance of Rs. 5,00,00,000 made by the Assessing Officer under Section 14A read with Rule 8D of the Income-tax Rules, 1962, in respect of investments made by the assessee for assessment year 2018-19, was correctly sustained by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals).Analysis: The issue engages the statutory framework governing disallowance of expenditure in relation to exempt income, specifically Section 14A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and the computation methodology prescribed by Rule 8D of the Income-tax Rules, 1962, as well as the relevant administrative guidance in Circular No. 5/2014 dated 11.02.2014. The factual matrix shows the assessee held investments during the relevant year but did not receive any exempt income in that year. Established principle under the cited statutory and administrative framework is that where no exempt income is received or receivable in the relevant period, no disallowance under Section 14A is warranted; the appellate authority applied that principle in allowing relief to the assessee and deleted the disallowance computed by the Assessing Officer under Rule 8D.Conclusion: The deletion of the Section 14A disallowance by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) is upheld; the Revenue's appeal is dismissed and the disallowance of Rs. 5,00,00,000 is not sustained.