Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the income derived from repair and maintenance of aircraft through hangars developed under a BOT arrangement at the airport qualified for deduction under section 80-IA(4) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The hangar was developed pursuant to an agreement with the airport authority and was to be used exclusively for aircraft maintenance, servicing and repairs. The statutory definition of infrastructure facility includes an airport, and the material on record showed that an airport includes aircraft maintenance facilities and aerodrome structures. The hangar was therefore treated as an essential and integral part of the airport facility, not as a merely incidental structure. The reasoning also accepted that deduction under section 80-IA(4) is not confined to development of the entire infrastructure facility, but can extend to development of a part of such facility when that part itself forms an integral component of the infrastructure.
Conclusion: The claim for deduction under section 80-IA(4) was held allowable in respect of income from repair and maintenance operations carried on through the hangar, and the disallowance was rejected.