Revenue deductibility for bank securities interest and premium amortisation affirmed; related disallowances and book profit additions rejected.

The note analyses tax treatment of various banking items and concludes operative effects: broken period interest on securities held as stock in trade is deductible as revenue; amortisation of premium on HTM securities is allowable; interest on contractual perpetual debt instruments treated as borrowings is deductible as business expense; an admitted capital loss was properly allowed; estimated wage-arrears provisions on accrual were acceptable; disallowance under rules for exempt-income-related expenses and additions to book profit is not warranted on these facts; accrued NPA interest not recognised need not be taxed under special accrual rules; year-end provisions without TDS were not wholly disallowable; club fees incurred for business are allowable.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether broken period interest paid on securities held by the bank is capital or allowable as revenue deduction; (ii) Whether amortisation of premium on securities in HTM category is disallowable; (iii) Whether interest on Innovative Perpetual Debt Instruments (IPDI) is disallowable as not being borrowing; (iv) Whether claim of capital loss for AY 2021-22 was rightly allowed without further verification; (v) Whether estimated amounts included under section 43B for wage arrears were correctly deleted; (vi) Whether disallowance under section 14A read with Rule 8D and its addition to book profit under section 115JB was justified; (vii) Whether Rule 6EA applies for computing accrued interest on NPAs; (viii) Whether year-end provisions for expenses on which TDS was not deducted are disallowable under section 40(a)(ia); (ix) Whether club fees paid by the bank are personal and disallowable.

Issue (i): Whether broken period interest on securities held by the bank is capital outlay or allowable as revenue deduction.

Analysis: The Tribunal reviewed binding and persuasive precedents including the Supreme Court decision in Bank of Rajasthan (Citi Bank/Bank of Rajasthan) and relevant High Court and ITAT precedents, and considered the banking practice of holding and trading securities as stock in trade and the accounting treatment adopted by the assessee.

Conclusion: The deletion of the disallowance in favour of the assessee is upheld; broken period interest is allowable as revenue deduction.

Issue (ii): Whether amortisation of premium in respect of securities in HTM category is disallowable.

Analysis: The Tribunal considered the assessee's compliance with RBI guidelines, application of ICDS VIII, CBDT instruction, and consistent appellate decisions of the jurisdictional High Court and ITAT which treated such amortisation as allowable in the facts of banking operations.

Conclusion: The deletion of the disallowance in favour of the assessee is upheld; amortisation of premium is allowable.

Issue (iii): Whether interest on Innovative Perpetual Debt Instruments (IPDI) is deductible as interest on borrowing.

Analysis: The Tribunal examined the contractual and accounting characterisation of IPDIs, RBI treatment for regulatory capital purposes, prior ITAT decisions and the assessee's treatment of interest as profit and loss expenditure to determine whether IPDIs constitute borrowing for business purposes.

Conclusion: The deletion of the disallowance in favour of the assessee is upheld; interest on IPDI is allowable as business interest.

Issue (iv): Whether the claim of capital loss for AY 2021-22 was properly allowed by the CIT(A) without restoration to AO.

Analysis: The Tribunal reviewed the record showing that relevant details and documentary evidence were submitted to the AO during assessment and considered the appellate findings which accepted those submissions.

Conclusion: The CIT(A)'s allowance of the capital loss is upheld; the ground is dismissed.

Issue (v): Whether estimated amounts included under section 43B for wage arrears should have been disallowed.

Analysis: The Tribunal noted the assessee's accrual accounting, the basis for estimating wage arrears pending final settlement, and precedent decisions of the ITAT on similar facts accepting such provisions.

Conclusion: The deletion of the disallowance in favour of the assessee is upheld; the ground is dismissed.

Issue (vi): Whether disallowance under section 14A read with Rule 8D and its addition to book profit under section 115JB was correct.

Analysis: The Tribunal applied binding decisions including Supreme Court and jurisdictional authorities distinguishing applicability of section 14A and Rule 8D where securities are held as stock in trade, and reviewed authorities holding that Rule 8D disallowance should not be added for computing book profit under section 115JB.

Conclusion: The deletions made by the CIT(A) are upheld; disallowance under section 14A/Rule 8D is not sustainable and cannot be added for computing book profit under section 115JB.

Issue (vii): Whether Rule 6EA should be applied to compute accrued interest on NPAs.

Analysis: The Tribunal considered RBI norms, recognized accounting treatment for NPAs adopted by the assessee, and consistent ITAT and High Court precedents holding that interest not recognised under RBI guidance should not be taxed by invoking Rule 6EA where applicable facts support non-recognition.

Conclusion: The CIT(A)'s deletion of the addition is upheld; Rule 6EA was not to be applied to disallow the challenged interest.

Issue (viii): Whether year-end provisions for expenses on which TDS was not deducted are disallowable under section 40(a)(ia).

Analysis: The Tribunal examined whether liabilities had accrued or were merely provisions, the nature of the provisions recorded on accrual basis, earlier favorable ITAT decisions of the assessee and the material showing tax was deducted when bills were received.

Conclusion: The CIT(A)'s deletion of the addition is upheld; the provisions are not wholly disallowable under section 40(a)(ia) on the facts.

Issue (ix): Whether club entrance fees and subscriptions are personal expenses and disallowable under section 37(1).

Analysis: The Tribunal reviewed the nature of the payments, documentary justification showing business purpose, and relevant High Court and ITAT authorities treating corporate club membership fees as revenue expenditure where incurred wholly and exclusively for business.

Conclusion: The deletion of the disallowance is upheld; club fees are allowable revenue expenditure.

Final Conclusion: All substantive grounds raised by the Revenue were examined and, following binding and closely analogous precedents and the facts and accounting treatment presented by the assessee, the Tribunal upholds the CIT(A)'s decisions in favour of the assessee and dismisses the appeals of the Revenue and the assessee's cross-objection.

Ratio Decidendi: Where a banking assessee holds securities as stock in trade and follows RBI and applicable accounting/ICDS treatment, related broken period interest and amortisation of premium are revenue deductions; interest on contractual perpetual debt instruments characterized and accounted as borrowings is deductible as business interest; disallowances under section 14A/Rule 8D and additions to book profit under section 115JB are not warranted on such facts; provisions properly made on accrual basis and supported by documents are not to be disallowed under section 40(a)(ia) or section 43B without contrary evidence.

---