Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2025 (2) TMI 1573 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Warranty deductions, bad debt write-offs, non-resident service payments, and foreign tax credit are clarified under treaty and tax rules. Warranty provisions were treated as deductible business expenditure where the estimate was scientifically made and consistent with prior years, and bad ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Warranty deductions, bad debt write-offs, non-resident service payments, and foreign tax credit are clarified under treaty and tax rules.

                            Warranty provisions were treated as deductible business expenditure where the estimate was scientifically made and consistent with prior years, and bad debts written off in the books were allowed under section 36(1)(vii) without requiring proof of insolvency or recoverability. Payments to a non-resident marketing or consultancy recipient were held not to attract TDS where treaty conditions for Indian taxation were not satisfied and the services related to business outside India. Foreign tax credit was left for reconsideration under Article 23 of the India-Sri Lanka DTAA and Rule 128, with the matter remitted to the Assessing Officer.




                            Issues: (i) whether provision for warranty expenses was allowable as deduction; (ii) whether bad debts written off were allowable; (iii) whether payment to a non-resident for overseas marketing or technical services attracted tax deduction at source and disallowance; and (iv) whether foreign tax credit was allowable in the year claimed.

                            Issue (i): whether provision for warranty expenses was allowable as deduction.

                            Analysis: The warranty obligation arose from completed projects and was an integral part of the contract price. The claim had been made on a scientific basis and the same practice had been accepted in earlier years on identical facts. Following the earlier co-ordinate bench rulings and the settled principle that warranty liability, if reliably estimated, is deductible, the provision could not be disallowed merely because it was created on estimate.

                            Conclusion: The disallowance of warranty provision was not sustainable and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.

                            Issue (ii): whether bad debts written off were allowable.

                            Analysis: The amount had been written off in the books and the controversy was governed by the settled rule that, after the statutory amendment, it is not necessary to prove that the debt has actually become irrecoverable. Once the debt is written off in the accounts and the other statutory conditions are met, deduction follows. The earlier co-ordinate bench decision on identical facts was applied.

                            Conclusion: The bad debt claim was allowable and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.

                            Issue (iii): whether payment to a non-resident for overseas marketing or technical services attracted tax deduction at source and disallowance.

                            Analysis: The services were rendered and utilised outside India in connection with overseas projects. On the facts found, the payment did not result in income deemed to accrue or arise in India, and the treaty position also supported the view that the non-resident's income was not taxable in India on those facts. Consequently, the payer had no withholding obligation and disallowance for failure to deduct tax was not justified.

                            Conclusion: The disallowance for non-deduction of tax at source was deleted and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.

                            Issue (iv): whether foreign tax credit was allowable in the year claimed.

                            Analysis: The authorities below did not examine the interaction between the treaty provision on double taxation relief and the rule governing foreign tax credit. The matter required reconsideration in the light of the treaty and the applicable rule, and therefore the issue was not finally concluded on merits in the assessee's favour at this stage.

                            Conclusion: The matter was restored for reconsideration and was disposed of for statistical purposes.

                            Final Conclusion: The assessee succeeded on the substantive issues relating to warranty provision, bad debts, and withholding tax on overseas service payments, while the foreign tax credit issue was remitted for fresh examination.

                            Ratio Decidendi: A warranty liability supported by a reliable scientific estimate is deductible, a bad debt is allowable once written off in the books subject to the statutory conditions, and no withholding obligation arises where the non-resident service income is not chargeable in India.


                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found