Section 80IB(10) housing project deduction sent back for fresh review of developer status and supporting evidence.

Entitlement to deduction under section 80IB(10) depended on whether the assessee acted as a developer or merely as a contractor, with the evidentiary record on land ownership, project approvals and completion certificate requiring closer scrutiny. The tribunal noted that the assessee had produced material supporting its claim that it purchased the land, obtained approvals and completion certificate in its own name, and developed the housing project, while the lower authorities had rejected the claim mainly because plots were sold before construction. As similar assessments for earlier years were pending, the matter was sent back to the Commissioner (Appeals) for fresh adjudication on all relevant evidence, without any final finding on the deduction claim.

---

---

Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to deduction under section 80IB(10) on profits from the housing project, and whether the matter required reconsideration in light of the evidentiary record regarding ownership, approvals, and completion certificate.

Analysis: The record showed that the assessee claimed to have purchased land, obtained project approvals and completion certificates in its own name, and carried out the housing project as a developer. The lower authorities rejected the claim by treating the assessee as a mere contractor on the basis that plots were sold before construction and relying on an earlier view. The appellate tribunal noted that the assessee had placed material on record supporting its case and that similar assessments for earlier years were pending, so the evidentiary position required a fresh examination by the first appellate authority. In these circumstances, a decision on the entitlement under section 80IB(10) was not finally affirmed or negated on merits at this stage.

Conclusion: The issue was restored to the Commissioner (Appeals) for fresh adjudication after considering all relevant evidence, and the assessee's appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.

---