Transaction value must reflect discounts applied at depot sales, producing duty relief on the net sale price after verification.

Where goods are transferred to depots or consignment agents and sold there, valuation under Section 4 read with Rule 7 requires using the normal transaction value of goods sold from that other place; discounts given at the time of sale from the depot reduce the transaction value and are not includible in assessable value. A presumptive factory removal value does not supplant the definitive depot sale price, and absence of provisional assessment does not change this methodology. Relief by adjustment or refund is available where gross duty was charged but net depot sale price (after discounts) is the true transaction value, subject to document verification and unjust enrichment checks.

---

---

Issues: Whether, for goods transferred to depots/C&F agents and sold from such depots, the assessable value for central excise duty under Section 4 of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with Rule 7 of the Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000 should be determined after allowing discounts given at the time of sale from the depot (net value) or on the gross value used at the time of removal from factory.

Analysis: The statutory framework requires valuation under Section 4 of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and, where goods are transferred to depots or consignment agents and sold from such other place, Rule 7 of the Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000 directs use of the normal transaction value of goods sold from that other place at or about the same time. Where removal from factory is on a presumptive value and the definitive transaction value is fixed only at sale from the depot, discounts applied at the time of sale from the depot affect the transaction value. The appellant's case and earlier Tribunal decisions establish that where discounts are given at the time of sale from the depot and are not disputed in nature or quantum, such discounts are not includible in assessable value. The absence of provisional assessment does not alter the valuation methodology under Section 4 and Rule 7. The finding of excess duty paid because gross value (without discounts) was used at factory removal, whereas net depot sale price (after discounts) is the transaction value, supports entitlement to adjustment or refund subject to document verification and unjust enrichment considerations.

Conclusion: Duty must be determined on the net transaction value after allowing discounts given at the time of sale from the depot; the appellant is entitled to relief (including refund or adjustment) subject to verification of supporting documents and unjust enrichment checks.

---