Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment order dated 26.11.2019 passed under Section 144 read with Section 147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 can be set aside on the ground that the assessee was not afforded an opportunity to file objections or to be heard due to notices being sent to her old address.
Analysis: The Court noted that the petitioner had shifted residence from Delhi to Chennai in 2008 and did not receive departmental correspondence sent to her old Delhi address; the impugned assessment under Section 144 read with Section 147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was passed without giving the petitioner an opportunity to file a reply or to appear for personal hearing. The respondent conceded that if directed by the Court, an opportunity would be provided. The Court considered the requirement of affording an opportunity of filing reply and personal hearing where an assessment affecting the taxpayer is made, and found that absence of notice or opportunity resulting from correspondence being sent to an outdated address justified interference.
Conclusion: The impugned assessment order dated 26.11.2019 is set aside and the matter is remanded to the Department with a direction to afford the petitioner an opportunity to file her reply and to grant a personal hearing, after which the appropriate orders shall be passed (decision in favour of the assessee).