Just a moment...
We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
- Overview Summary
- Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
- Relevant Case Laws
- Tariff / Classification / HSN
- Expert views from TaxTMI
- Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the reassessment order dated 29.03.2022 under Section 147 read with Section 144B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for A.Y. 2017-2018 is vitiated by denial of an opportunity of hearing through video conferencing and thereby violates principles of natural justice.
Analysis: The petitioner did not file a return for A.Y.2017-18 and received notice initiating reassessment proceedings. A show cause cum draft assessment order granted time to submit explanation up to 23:59 hours of 28.03.2022; the petitioner uploaded a request for video conferencing on 28.03.2022. The reassessment order dated 29.03.2022 was passed without providing the requested video conferencing hearing. The procedure set out in Section 144B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for faceless assessments includes an opportunity for hearing; denial of the requested mode of hearing resulted in absence of the hearing opportunity. Prior decision of the Court addressing faceless assessments and non-grant of hearing was applied to the facts.
Conclusion: The reassessment order dated 29.03.2022 passed under Section 147 read with Section 144B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and the consequential demand under Section 156 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 are quashed and set aside for violation of principles of natural justice by not affording the petitioner the video conferencing hearing; the Revenue may proceed afresh from the stage of grant of video conferencing and must afford hearing in accordance with Section 144B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 within 12 weeks of receipt of the order.