2025 (2) TMI 1518 - AT - Income Tax

Cash advances and income recognition: refunded advances reflected in bank records are not taxable income, addition deleted.

Whether cash advances received under sale agreements constitute the assessee's income where the advances were later recovered by police and refunded to ... Addition on account of concealed income - cash advances received against the sale agreement - HELD THAT:- In the present case, since the assessee has already refunded these advances to the persons from whom the amount received by account payee cheques and therefore, the assessee is left with no money. In our opinion, the income can only be treated when it has received or agreed to be received by the assessee and not otherwise. In the present case, the money received stood refunded and returned to the entities from whom these were received which was confirmed by the parties. Therefore, we are not in concurrence to the conclusion drawn by the CIT (A) on the issue. Consequently, we set aside the order of CIT (Appeals) and direct the AO to delete the addition. Appeal of the assessee is allowed. Issues: Whether cash advances of Rs. 1,00,02,000 received against sale agreements constitute the assessee's income where the advances were subsequently recovered by police, refunded to the payors by account payee cheques and the amount was shown in impounded books and admitted during survey.Analysis: The assessment was initiated after processing under Section 143(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and selection for scrutiny. The admitted facts include receipt of aggregate cash advances of Rs. 1,00,02,000, occurrence of an armed robbery on the same day, police recovery and court-ordered investigation and restoration, cancellation of sale agreements by the payors, and refund of the advances by the assessee through account payee cheques which were encashed. Books impounded during survey recorded the sum as income and a director made a statement during survey; however the sum was not retained by the assessee as it was refunded to the payors and the refunds were reflected in bank records.Conclusion: The amount of Rs. 1,00,02,000 does not constitute the assessee's income because the advances were returned to the payors and the assessee no longer retained the sum; the appellate order confirming the addition is set aside and the assessing officer is directed to delete the addition.