Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the delay of 229 days in filing the appeal before the Tribunal should be condoned; (ii) Whether assessment proceedings and notices under section 148 and section 142(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, issued after the assessee company was struck off from the Registrar of Companies, are valid or liable to be quashed.
Issue (i): Whether the delay of 229 days in filing the appeal should be condoned.
Analysis: The Bench considered the explanation and documentary proof that the company was struck off from the Registrar of Companies w.e.f. 14.07.2017 and that the erstwhile director was consequently unaware of the proceedings; the condonation petition set out those circumstances and supporting certificates from the Registrar of Companies and Official Liquidator were placed on record.
Conclusion: Delay of 229 days is condoned in favour of the assessee.
Issue (ii): Whether notices issued under section 148 and section 142(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, after the company was struck off, are valid.
Analysis: The Bench examined the effect of the company's striking off (w.e.f. 14.07.2017) and the fact that the erstwhile director had informed the Assessing Officer of the company's non-existence; notices and assessment proceedings issued after the company ceased to exist were treated as service on a non-existent person and thus impermissible under the circumstances presented.
Conclusion: The assessment order and the notices under section 148 and section 142(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, issued after the company was struck off are quashed in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The appeal is allowed and the impugned assessment proceedings and orders are set aside on the ground that notices were served on and proceedings pursued against a company which had ceased to exist.
Ratio Decidendi: Notices and assessment proceedings under the Income-tax Act, 1961, served after the company has been struck off from the Registrar of Companies amount to service on a non-existent entity and, where the non-existence is established and notified to the tax authorities, such proceedings are liable to be quashed.