Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the arrest complied with Section 19(1) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, and whether any infirmity in forwarding the arrest material under Section 19(2) or in the remand proceedings vitiated the detention.
Analysis: The petitioner's arrest was examined against the statutory requirements that the authorised officer must have material in possession, record reasons to believe in writing, and inform the arrestee of the grounds of arrest. The record showed that the written grounds of arrest were furnished on the date of arrest and acknowledged by signature. The Court also noted repeated non-appearance to summons, the surrounding circumstances relied upon by the investigating agency, and the special court's remand order, which reflected application of mind to the grounds of arrest and the prima facie allegations under the money-laundering provisions. As to Section 19(2), the Court held that forwarding the material to the Adjudicating Authority a day or two later did not by itself establish non-compliance, since the provision did not prescribe same-day transmission as a mandatory requirement.
Conclusion: The arrest was held to be in conformity with Section 19(1) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, and no illegality was found in the remand orders or the subsequent proceedings.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the written grounds of arrest under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 are supplied and acknowledged on the date of arrest, and the remand court applies its mind to the record, the arrest satisfies Section 19 despite later forwarding of material to the Adjudicating Authority under Section 19(2).