Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the penalty imposed under Section 272A(1)(d) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for non-compliance with notice issued under Section 142(1) is sustainable where the assessee subsequently complied with notices and the assessment was finally completed under Section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The assessee failed to respond to the notice dated 02.11.2019 issued under Section 142(1), but subsequently furnished the required information in response to later notices and the assessment was completed under Section 143(3). The assessing officer, by framing the assessment under Section 143(3) after considering the information, effectively accepted the explanations and evidence later filed. Reliance is placed on the principle that when the assessee ultimately complies and the assessment is completed after considering such compliance, the earlier default is deemed condoned and penalty levied under provisions such as Section 272A(1)(d) is not justified. The Tribunal followed the coordinate decision applying Section 273B and related authorities dealing with deletion of penalties where compliance is ultimately found acceptable during assessment proceedings.
Conclusion: Penalty imposed under Section 272A(1)(d) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 is not justifiable in the facts of the case and is to be deleted; decision is in favour of the assessee.