Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the insurance service provided by the Deposit Insurance and Credit Guarantee Corporation to banks is an "input service" permitting banks to avail CENVAT (service tax) credit, and whether penalties imposed on the banks survive if this finding is in favour of the banks.
Analysis: The question was examined in light of precedent by the Larger Bench in South Indian Bank v. CC Kozhikode, which addressed whether the Deposit Insurance Corporation's insurance service to banks qualifies as an input service and whether service tax paid on that service can be credited against output services rendered by banks. The Larger Bench answered this question after detailed consideration and concluded that the insurance service provided by the Deposit Insurance Corporation is an input service and that CENVAT credit of service tax paid for this service can be availed by banks for rendering output services. The present appeals involve identical factual and legal issues and therefore follow the Larger Bench ruling.
Conclusion: The insurance service provided by the Deposit Insurance and Credit Guarantee Corporation to banks is an input service; banks are entitled to avail CENVAT (service tax) credit of the service tax paid on that service. Consequently, penalties linked to the denial of such credit do not survive. The appeals are allowed in favour of the assessee.