Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee's claim of deduction of bad debts of Rs. 1,98,70,000 (written off 25% of receivables from NSEL) is allowable under section 36(1)(vii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for A.Y.2017-18.
Analysis: The Tribunal examined facts showing the assessee had recorded trading income from NSEL transactions and had written off 25% of outstanding receivables in its books on 30.09.2013 after the NSEL default and ongoing recovery/investigation processes. Applying the post-1989 amendment to section 36(1)(vii), the Tribunal reviewed legal precedent establishing that it is sufficient for a bad debt to be written off in the assessee's accounts for the deduction to be allowable, without the assessee having to prove the debt had in fact become irrecoverable. The Tribunal also relied on a coordinate-bench decision in a sister concern's case on substantially similar facts and findings. The Revenue's contention that the claim was premature because recovery efforts and investigations were ongoing was considered and rejected as inconsistent with the statutory test in section 36(1)(vii).
Conclusion: The claim for deduction of bad debt of Rs. 1,98,70,000 is allowable; the Revenue's appeal is dismissed and the disallowance by the lower authorities is set aside in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Under Section 36(1)(vii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 as amended w.e.f. 01.04.1989, a deduction for bad debts is allowable where the debt is written off as irrecoverable in the assessee's accounts; proof of actual irrecoverability is not required.