Custodial remand challenge rejected where the same issue had already been decided and the remand order was reasoned.

The challenge to the second ECIR, the arrest and the custodial remand was treated as identical to relief already considered in an earlier petition. The Court noted that the same issue had been decided by a co-ordinate Bench and that the Special Judge's remand order under Section 167 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 was a reasoned order. On that basis, the Court declined interference and held that no different view could be taken, leaving the arrest and remand undisturbed.

---

---

Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to relief against arrest and custodial remand in connection with the second ECIR.

Analysis: The challenge to the second ECIR, the arrest and the remand order was treated as identical to the reliefs already considered in an earlier petition. The Court noted that the same issue had already been decided by a co-ordinate Bench and that the Special Judge's remand order under Section 167 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 was a reasoned order.

Conclusion: The Court declined interference and held that no different view could be taken on the petitioner's challenge.

Final Conclusion: The petition did not succeed and the impugned arrest and remand were left undisturbed.

---