Just a moment...
We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
- Overview Summary
- Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
- Relevant Case Laws
- Tariff / Classification / HSN
- Expert views from TaxTMI
- Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the applicant (accused) Pradeep Parashar is entitled to regular bail in respect of alleged offences under Sections 3 and 4 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) and Section 45 PMLA.
Analysis: The applicant produced bank records showing transfer of Rs.10,00,000 to the co-accused prior to the REET 2021 examination and earlier receipts of Rs.3,00,000 before the examination; a later deposit of Rs.3,00,000 also occurred but the earlier transactions are temporally antecedent to the alleged offence and have not been linked by the Enforcement Directorate to the alleged paper-leak offence. A charge-sheet has been filed and the applicant has been in custody for an extended period. The principal accused (co-accused) obtained bail from the Supreme Court; the factual matrix and the lack of linkage between the prior transactions and the alleged proceeds of crime were relevant to the bail assessment. Section 45 PMLA places on the accused the burden to show absence of a prima facie case; taking into account the applicant's evidence regarding earlier transactions, the fact of lengthy custody, and the Supreme Court's grant of bail to the main accused, the statutory pre-condition for denial of bail was not satisfied on the material before the court.
Conclusion: The applicant's bail petition is allowed; the applicant is entitled to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs.50,000 and two sureties of Rs.25,000 each to the satisfaction of the trial court.