Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Respondent must produce the disposal order dated 28th January, 2019, the order-in-original for disposal of the goods referred to in paragraph 44 of the Affidavit-in-Reply, and full particulars of the procedure followed for disposal of the gold, including notice, valuation, auction notice, bills, purchaser details and payment receipt.
Analysis: The Respondent's affidavit refers to a disposal order and to disposal having occurred after following a "due process of law" but does not annex the disposal order or provide particulars of the procedure, valuation, auction and receipts. The Court directs the Respondent to furnish the specific documents and particulars identified and to file a further affidavit containing those details within one week. The matter is listed for further consideration on the next date fixed, indicating an interim, document-production direction rather than a final adjudication on the merits.
Conclusion: The Respondent is directed to provide the disposal order dated 28th January, 2019, the order-in-original for disposal referred to in paragraph 44, and complete particulars of the disposal procedure (notice to Petitioner, valuation, auction notice, bills, purchaser details and payment receipt) by filing and serving an affirmed affidavit within one week; matter stands over to 5th December, 2022.