Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the liquidator's reduction of the reserve price and conduct of the e-auction in the liquidation process violated the liquidation regulations so as to warrant interference with the completed sale.
Analysis: The auction process was tested against the liquidation framework governing sale of assets, mode of sale, valuation, and reporting obligations. The liquidation regulations permit sale by auction and allow reduction of the reserve price where an auction fails, first up to twenty-five percent and thereafter by not more than ten percent at a time. The record showed that the appellant participated in the stakeholders' consultation meetings and was aware of the successive reductions in reserve price. No documentary material established any breach of the prescribed sale procedure or valuation requirements. The sale was completed, the full consideration was received, and the sale certificate had already been issued. In the context of the time-bound nature of insolvency proceedings, the challenge was also found to be belated.
Conclusion: The reduction in reserve price and the auction sale were held to be in accordance with the liquidation regulations, and no ground was made out to set aside the sale.