Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interference was warranted with the High Court's order quashing the detention order passed under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974.
Analysis: The detention order had been quashed by the High Court. The detenue had remained in custody for a couple of months and had thereafter been released. A statutory complaint under the Customs Act, 1962 had already been instituted and was pending adjudication. In these circumstances, and considering the period already undergone in custody, no compelling basis was made out for interference at that stage.
Conclusion: No interference was called for with the impugned judgment.