Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to bail in a prosecution under the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002.
Analysis: The application was considered in the background of the petitioner's custody, the filing of the complaint, the progress of the trial, the bail already granted to a co-accused, and the surrounding circumstances placed before the Court. The Court recorded that it was not expressing any opinion on the merits or demerits of the case while assessing the request for bail. Conditions were also imposed to secure the petitioner's appearance and to restrain alienation of alleged properties without permission of the Trial Court.
Conclusion: The petitioner was found entitled to bail.
Final Conclusion: Bail was granted to the petitioner on terms and conditions, without any finding on the merits of the alleged money-laundering offence.
Ratio Decidendi: Bail may be granted in a money-laundering prosecution on an assessment of the overall circumstances, including custody and progress of trial, without recording any conclusion on guilt.