Just a moment...
AI-powered research trained on the authentic TaxTMI database.
Launch AI Search →Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Validity of reopening of assessment and faceless assessment notice issuance: notice must be issued by faceless AO/JAO; statutory procedure required</h1> Validity of reopening focused on whether a faceless assessing officer or its joint authority must issue the show cause notice initiating reassessment; the ... Validity of reopening of assessment - introduction of faceless assessment - notice to be issued by Faceless Assessing Officer FAO or JAO - Issuing Authority jurisdiction to issue notice - HELD THAT:- Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Jatinder Singh Bhangu's case [2024 (7) TMI 1191 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] and Jasjit Singh's case [2024 (8) TMI 228 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] allowed the writ petitions on the same issue, as raised in the present writ petition, by granting liberty to the revenue to follow the procedure as laid down under the Act, 1961 and proceed accordingly, if so advised as held it is a settled proposition of law that assessment proceedings commence from the stage of issuance of show cause notice. The object of introduction of faceless assessment would be defeated if show cause notice under Section 148 is issued by Jurisdictional Assessing Officer. The respondents are heavily placing reliance upon office memorandum and letter issued by departmental authorities. It is axiomatic in tax jurisprudence that circulars, instructions and letters issued by Board or any other authority cannot override statutory provisions. The circulars are binding upon authorities and Courts are not bound by circulars. The mandate of Section 144B, 151A read with notification dated 29.03.2022 issued thereunder is quite lucid. Issues: Whether notices dated 22.03.2025 under Section 151 and 24.03.2025 under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 issued by the jurisdictional assessing authority are without jurisdiction in view of Notification dated 29.03.2022 and whether such notices and subsequent proceedings should be set aside.Analysis: The Court considered the scheme of faceless assessment as reflected in Section 151A and Section 144B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and the Notification dated 29.03.2022, which applies the faceless assessment regime from the stage of issuance of show cause notice under Section 148. The Court relied on earlier coordinate-bench decisions in Jatinder Singh Bhangu and Jasjit Singh where identical issues were examined and those writ petitions were allowed; the coordinate-bench reasoning held that statutory notification and provisions govern the competence to issue Section 148 notices and that office memoranda or departmental instructions cannot override statutory mandate. Applying that reasoning to the present facts, the impugned notices issued by the jurisdictional assessing authority fall foul of the statutory scheme and the Notification.Conclusion: The notices under Sections 151 and 148 and consequent proceedings are set aside; decision is in favour of the assessee.Ratio Decidendi: Where a statutory notification and provisions (Sections 151A and 144B read with Notification dated 29.03.2022) vest exclusive competence in the faceless assessment mechanism to issue show cause notices under Section 148, administrative circulars or office memoranda cannot validate issuance of such notices by the jurisdictional assessing officer.