Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether an appellate authority may entertain an additional claim for deduction (service tax) made for the first time during assessment proceedings and, if so, whether the claim for deduction under section 37 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 of Rs.40,82,852/- should be examined on merits.
Analysis: The issue turns on the distinction between the power of the assessing officer to accept a claim without a revised return and the power of appellate authorities to admit and decide new claims or grounds arising in the matter. Coordinate judicial authorities have recognised that Goetze (India) Ltd. is confined to the power of the assessing officer and does not prohibit appellate authorities from entertaining additional claims; appellate discretion extends to permitting new factual or legal claims within the contours of the subject matter of the appeal. Where there is no statutory bar, an additional claim made during assessment proceedings can be remitted for examination on the evidence before the assessing authority. The matter was therefore remitted to the assessing authority for examination of the allowability of the service tax deduction in light of the evidence on record.
Conclusion: Issue (i) decided partly in favour of the assessee; the claim for deduction under section 37 is to be examined by the Assessing Officer on the merits after remand.