Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee (a charitable trust) is entitled to exemption under section 11 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 despite (i) filing the income tax return after the due date under section 139(1) and (ii) uploading the audit report in Form No.10B belatedly (filed during appellate proceedings).
Analysis: Applicable statutory provisions include section 11, clause (b) and clause (ba) of section 12A(1), and the filing requirements of section 139 (including sub-sections (4A) and (5)). CBDT circulars and administrative directions clarify that returns filed within the time allowed under section 139 (including belated returns under section 139(5) where applicable) should be treated as meeting clause (ba) of section 12A(1) for specified years; authorities have power to consider condonation of delayed audit reports under section 119(2) and administrative instructions. Judicial authorities have characterised the requirement to furnish the audit report in Form No.10B as directory/substantial compliance in appropriate circumstances and have condoned delay where the audit report was filed before appellate disposal and the audit was conducted prior to filing of return. The facts show return was filed belatedly but within the period contemplated for belated returns for relevant years and Form No.10B was uploaded during appellate proceedings (with audit date preceding filing), invoking the principles of substantial compliance and condonation as reflected in CBDT guidance and judicial precedents.
Conclusion: The exemption under section 11 is allowable to the assessee; the delayed filing of the return and belated uploading of Form No.10B do not disentitle the assessee where belated return falls within the time allowed under section 139 and the audit report was filed during appellate proceedings with audit dated prior to filing. Relief is in favour of the assessee.