Section 14A and Rule 8D invocation requires AO's recorded dissatisfaction with claim; absence vitiates disallowance and allows appeal

Addresses the requirement for tax authorities to record express or implied dissatisfaction with an assessees claim before applying a notional disallowance computation for exempt income. The analysis finds that merely noting that disallowance was not computed according to the prescribed computation mechanism does not amount to a substantive examination of the correctness of expenditure claims, and therefore cannot justify invoking the notional disallowance procedure; absence of recorded dissatisfaction defeats the basis for the disallowance, resulting in reversal of the adjustment.

---

---

Issues: Whether the Assessing Officer was justified in invoking Rule 8D of the Income-tax Rules, 1962 to compute and enhance the disallowance under Section 14A(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 in absence of any express or implied satisfaction recorded on the correctness of the assessee's claim.

Analysis: The statutory scheme under Section 14A(2) conditions application of the methodology in Rule 8D upon the Assessing Officer being not satisfied with the correctness of the assessee's claim having regard to the assessee's accounts. Rule 8D implements the mandate of subsection (2) but does not supplant the requirement of an objective satisfaction by the Assessing Officer. Where the Assessing Officer proceeds solely by applying the formula in Rule 8D without recording any express or implied dissatisfaction based on the accounts, the precondition for invoking the prescribed method is not met. The facts show the Assessing Officer noted that the disallowance was not computed as per Rule 8D and applied the Rule to compute an enhanced disallowance, but did not independently examine or record dissatisfaction as to the correctness of the assessee's suo-motu computation.

Conclusion: Invocation of Rule 8D to compute and enhance the disallowance under Section 14A(2) is not justified where the Assessing Officer has not recorded an objective satisfaction (express or implied) based on the accounts that the assessee's claim is incorrect. The disallowance computed by applying Rule 8D is deleted and the appeal is allowed in favour of the assessee.

---