Validity of reopening of assessment Limitation period clarified per Rajeev Bansal; notice timing and officer verification prescribed

Validity of reopening of assessment addresses the calculation of the limitation period for issuance of a reopening notice, relying on the Rajeev Bansal judgment. The legal basis prescribes a narrowly calculated time window for issuance of notices under the reassessment regime; where an extended proviso applies, a longer short-term window is available, and the assessing officer must verify compliance with that calculation. The assessing officer is directed to examine issuance timing in light of the cited authority and para 112 of that judgment, with the petition disposed accordingly.

---

---

Issues: Whether the reassessment notice issued under section 148 (as applied under the new reassessment regime) was time-barred in view of the transition principles laid down in the precedent referenced by the Court (Rajeev Bansal) and whether the petition addressing that question is covered by that precedent.

Analysis: The issue is examined by applying the limitation computation principles set out in the cited precedent, including the effect of objections filed under section 148A(b) and the temporal application of the fourth proviso to section 149. The factual timeline must be compared against the example calculation in paragraph 112 of the precedent to determine the period available to the Assessing Officer to issue a fresh notice under the new regime. The assessing officer is directed to apply those principles to the facts and the timeline presented (including the dates of the original section 148 notice, the section 148A(b) notice and the objection), and to determine whether the notice under section 148 falls outside the permissible period.

Conclusion: The petition is disposed of in accordance with the cited precedent; the matter is covered by the precedent and the reassessment notice is to be examined for time-bar on the basis of the precedent, resulting in a disposition that is favorable to the respondent (assessee).

---