Just a moment...
We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
- Overview Summary
- Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
- Relevant Case Laws
- Tariff / Classification / HSN
- Expert views from TaxTMI
- Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner is entitled to liberty to file statutory appeals against the impugned adjudication orders relating to financial years 2017-18 to 2022-23, including permission to withdraw funds from bank accounts for making the statutory pre-deposit and payment of costs, and restoration of operation of bank accounts upon compliance with specified conditions.
Analysis: The petitioner challenged six adjudication orders and the attachment of bank accounts and claimed inability to make statutory pre-deposits due to financial hardship arising from the attachment and recovery of funds. The Court examined the procedural availability of appeals against the impugned orders and conditioned relief on the petitioner meeting specified financial and procedural prerequisites: payment of a cost of Rs.5 lakhs to the authority, making a statutory pre-deposit of 10% of the disputed tax in each appeal, payment of deficit court fees for five adjudication orders, withdrawal from the attached bank accounts of the sums necessary for the pre-deposit and cost within one week, filing the appeals with proof of such payments within three days of withdrawal, and filing proof of compliance before the appellate authority. The appellate authority was directed to hear the appeals on merits if these conditions are complied with. The order specified that non-compliance would render the order ineffective.
Conclusion: Liberty granted to the petitioner to file statutory appeals against the impugned adjudication orders on condition that the petitioner pays Rs.5 lakhs as cost, makes a 10% statutory pre-deposit in each appeal, pays the deficit court fees, withdraws necessary amounts from the bank accounts within one week, files the appeals with proof of payments within three days of withdrawal, and files proof of compliance before the appellate authority; upon such compliance the appellate authority shall hear the appeals on merits and the bank shall allow operation of the accounts.