Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a vehicle seized in connection with an offence under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 can be released in interim custody under Section 457 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 notwithstanding Section 60(3) of that Act.
Analysis: The seized vehicle was not required to remain in police custody until the conclusion of trial merely because it was liable to eventual confiscation under Section 60(3) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. The statutory scheme contained no express bar against resort to Section 457 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for interim release of the vehicle. The conditions in Section 60(3), relating to proof of use without knowledge or connivance of the owner, operate at the stage of confiscation after trial and do not control the question of interim custody. The prior decisions relied upon recognized that a registered owner may be given interim custody to preserve the vehicle and prevent deterioration.
Conclusion: Interim release of the seized vehicle under Section 457 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 was permissible and the rejection of the release application solely on the basis of Section 60(3) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 was unsustainable. The relief was granted in favour of the petitioner.