Criminal conspiracy to murder: HC rejects bail where circumstances prima facie pointed to a hired-killer plot.

In a bail application arising from allegations of criminal conspiracy to murder by hiring contract killers, the HC found that the material, taken together, prima facie indicated a coordinated plan against the deceased. The Court relied on prior animus, recorded threats, alleged efforts to secure an executor, telephonic contacts among the accused, recovery of arms from one applicant's premises, and the deceased's complaints expressing fear for his life. It held that detailed scrutiny of admissibility or reliability was unnecessary at the bail stage, and that the risk of tampering with evidence and influencing witnesses could not be dismissed. Bail was therefore rejected.

---

---

Issues: Whether the applicants were entitled to bail in a case alleging criminal conspiracy to murder the deceased by hiring contract killers.

Analysis: The accusations against the applicants were not of direct participation in the assault, but of having conspired with others to eliminate the deceased. The material relied upon included prior animus, repeated threats perceived and recorded by the deceased, the alleged approach to a person to execute the , telephonic contacts among the accused, recovery of arms from the premises of one applicant, and the deceased's prior complaints expressing apprehension for his life. At the bail stage, the Court held that detailed scrutiny of admissibility and reliability was unnecessary, and that the circumstances, taken together, prima facie formed a chain pointing to conspiracy and hiring of contract killers. The Court also found that the apprehension of tampering with evidence and influencing witnesses could not be said to be unfounded.

Conclusion: The applicants were not entitled to bail and the applications were rejected.

---