Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the fees charged by the service provider for facilitating high-voltage transmission connection and related services were taxable as erection, commissioning and installation service or were covered by the exemption linked to transmission of power.
Analysis: The Tribunal followed its earlier coordinate-bench decisions and the Gujarat High Court ruling holding that the expression "in relation to" transmission of power is of wide amplitude and covers ancillary activities undertaken till the object of transmission and distribution of electricity is achieved. It also noted that the circular relied upon by the Revenue had been struck down as inconsistent with the statutory scheme, while the earlier circular treated services connected with transmission as falling within the exempted ambit. The issue was treated as no longer res integra.
Conclusion: The impugned demand was not sustainable and the appeal succeeded in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Services that are integrally connected with transmission of power and rendered toward achieving the object of electricity transmission fall within the wide sweep of the exemption expression "in relation to" and cannot be taxed as a separate service merely because they are ancillary to the main transmission activity.