1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' to jump to entered page
Press 'Enter' to jump to entered page
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' to jump to entered page
Press 'Enter' to jump to entered page
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' to jump to entered page
<h1>Central excise duty liability dispute: appellant sought relief despite binding precedent; no distinguishing grounds, appeal dismissed without costs.</h1> The dominant issue was whether the appeal could succeed despite a binding SC precedent governing the same legal question. Applying the ratio in an earlier ... - In view of the binding precedent in *Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. v. Collector of Central Excise* [1995 (77) E.L.T. 256 (S.C.) = 1995 Supp. (3) SCC 45], the Court dismissed the civil appeal. The order rests entirely on the application of that earlier judgment, treating it as determinative of the issues raised and leaving no basis to grant relief to the appellant. The Court held: 'In view of the judgment of this Court in Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. v. Collector of Central Excise ..., the Civil Appeal is dismissed.' No costs were awarded: 'There shall be no orders as to costs.'